{
 "cells": [
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": "# Shunya Siddhanta & Quantum Architecture\n## शून्य-सिद्धान्त एवं क्वान्टम-समीकरणम् · Quantum Topology & P-Adic Time Collapse (4 chapters)\n**Format:** decoded chapter suite · **Scope:** Quantum & P-Adic Topology · 4 Chapters\n**Execution:** every code cell below was executed with Python 3.11.15 on 2026-10-07 by scripts/library/sync_library.py; the outputs are the real stdout of that run.\n\n*यह ऐतिहासिक ग्रन्थों पर आधारित पाठ और गणना है, चिकित्सा-परामर्श नहीं। · Text and computation about historical treatises — not medical advice.*\n\n---"
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": "## Chapter 1: p-अडिक नाम-प्रमाण एवं निल्पोटेंट काल-परिवर्तन (P-Adic Ultrametric Space & Nilpotent Time Reversal ([T]⁷ ≡ 0))\n**Scope:** `Section 1.1 – 1.15` · **Reading:** `16 min study`\n\n### Overview\nInterpretive chapter. The snippet computes the 7-adic norm |x|₇ and labels a step count modulo 7 (“nilpotent_step”); the reading of this as time-reversal into a “ground void” is an interpretation, not a result.\n\n### Ślokas & anvaya\n> **पञ्चभूतात्मकं विश्वं नवधा सम्प्रकल्प्यते ।  \n> शून्यत्वे सर्वभावानां पुनरावृत्तिरीक्ष्यते ॥**\n>\n> *pañcabhūtātmakaṃ viśvaṃ navadhā samprakalpyate |  \n> śūnyatve sarvabhāvānāṃ punarāvṛttirīkṣyate ||*\n>\n> **Meter:** अनुष्टुभ् छन्दः\n>\n> **Source:** स्रोत अपरीक्षित · source unverified — no text in this repository carries this verse; it is not presented as a located quotation. Annex verse: not presented as a classical text.\n\n- **नवधा सम्प्रकल्प्यते**: Conceptualized across 9 manifold states\n- **शून्यत्वे सर्वभावानाम्**: In the ultimate Śūnya ground state of all existence\n- **पुनरावृत्तिः ईक्ष्यते**: Cyclic return and time-reversal is observed\n\nThe universe composed of five elements is reckoned in nine states. In the Śūnya void, all manifest states collapse and return back to the origin.\n\n### Formulation — P-Adic Ultrametric Distance & Nilpotent Operator\n$$|x + y|_p \\le \\max(|x|_p, |y|_p), \\quad [T]^p \\equiv 0 \\pmod p \\implies T^7 |\\Psi\\rangle = |000\\rangle$$\n\nThe ultrametric inequality holds for every p-adic norm; no physical system is modelled and no accuracy figure applies."
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 1,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": "def padic_norm(x, p=7):\n    if x == 0: return 0.0\n    v = 0\n    n = abs(x)\n    while n % p == 0:\n        v += 1\n        n //= p\n    return float(p ** (-v))\n\ndef nilpotent_step(step, p=7):\n    return \"|000⟩ (Pure Void)\" if step % p == 0 else f\"|Ψ_{step % p}⟩\""
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 2,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "output_type": "stream",
     "name": "stdout",
     "text": "padic_norm(14, 7) → 0.14285714285714285\npadic_norm(49, 7) → 0.02040816326530612\nnilpotent_step(7) → '|000⟩ (Pure Void)'\nnilpotent_step(10) → '|Ψ_3⟩'\n"
    }
   ],
   "source": "print('padic_norm(14, 7)', \"→\", repr(padic_norm(14, 7)))\nprint('padic_norm(49, 7)', \"→\", repr(padic_norm(49, 7)))\nprint('nilpotent_step(7)', \"→\", repr(nilpotent_step(7)))\nprint('nilpotent_step(10)', \"→\", repr(nilpotent_step(10)))"
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": "**Recorded output (dataset `codeOutput`, verified against the run above):**\n```\npadic_norm(14, 7) → 0.14285714285714285\npadic_norm(49, 7) → 0.02040816326530612\nnilpotent_step(7) → '|000⟩ (Pure Void)'\nnilpotent_step(10) → '|Ψ_3⟩'\nComputed by executing this snippet (Python 3.11.15, 2026-10-07).\n```"
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": "## Chapter 2: होमोमोर्फिक पेडरसन प्रतिबद्धता एवं ONP कोष-सुरक्षा (Toy Pedersen-style Commitment & a 40/60 Split (not zero-knowledge))\n**Scope:** `Section 2.1 – 2.20` · **Reading:** `18 min study`\n\n### Overview\nInterpretive chapter. A toy Pedersen-style commitment (exponents reduced mod 1000, modulus 2³¹ − 1) — not a zero-knowledge proof — and a function that splits an amount 40/60 with a 48-hour label. Not financial advice.\n\n### Ślokas & anvaya\n> **गुप्तं धनं सुसंरक्ष्यं द्विचत्वारिंशतात्मना ।  \n> शून्याधिकारयोगेन सर्वं कर्म न रिच्यते ॥**\n>\n> *guptaṃ dhanaṃ susaṃrakṣyaṃ dvicatvāriṃśatātmanā |  \n> śūnyādhikārayogena sarvaṃ karma na ricyate ||*\n>\n> **Meter:** अनुष्टुभ् छन्दः\n>\n> **Source:** स्रोत अपरीक्षित · source unverified — no text in this repository carries this verse; it is not presented as a located quotation. Annex verse: not presented as a classical text.\n\n- **गुप्तं धनं सुसंरक्ष्यम्**: Secret wealth must be cryptographically protected\n- **शून्याधिकारयोगेन**: Through the execution of Śūnya authority\n\nCryptographic wealth must be sealed and protected. Through Śūnya balance protocols, no computational or economic effort is dissipated.\n\n### Formulation — Homomorphic Pedersen Commitment & ONP Reserve Lock\n$$C(v, r) = g^v h^r \\pmod p, \\quad \\text{Reserve}_{\\text{locked}} = 0.40 \\times \\text{Inflow}$$\n\nHomomorphic addition C(v1+v2) = C(v1) * C(v2) mod p allows zk verification without revealing amounts."
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 3,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": "def pedersen_commit(val, blinding=999999, p=2147483647):\n    g, h = 3, 7\n    return (pow(g, val % 1000, p) * pow(h, blinding % 1000, p)) % p\n\ndef outflow_neutralization(inflow):\n    return {\"locked_40pct\": inflow * 0.40, \"operational\": inflow * 0.60, \"cooling_hrs\": 48}"
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 4,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "output_type": "stream",
     "name": "stdout",
     "text": "pedersen_commit(100000) → 1786920341\noutflow_neutralization(100000) → {'locked_40pct': 40000.0, 'operational': 60000.0, 'cooling_hrs': 48}\n"
    }
   ],
   "source": "print('pedersen_commit(100000)', \"→\", repr(pedersen_commit(100000)))\nprint('outflow_neutralization(100000)', \"→\", repr(outflow_neutralization(100000)))"
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": "**Recorded output (dataset `codeOutput`, verified against the run above):**\n```\npedersen_commit(100000) → 1786920341\noutflow_neutralization(100000) → {'locked_40pct': 40000.0, 'operational': 60000.0, 'cooling_hrs': 48}\n(pedersen_commit is a toy commitment (exponents reduced mod 1000), not a zero-knowledge proof)\nComputed by executing this snippet (Python 3.11.15, 2026-10-07).\n```"
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": "## Chapter 3: 108Q क्वान्टम-व्याख्या एवं बेरी-फेज ज्यामिति (108Q Interpretation & Geodetic Berry Phase (no hardware result recorded))\n**Scope:** `Section 3.1 – 3.25` · **Reading:** `20 min study`\n\n### Overview\nInterpretive chapter. No quantum-hardware result is recorded in this repository; the 71.4% figure is a constant written in the snippet, not a measurement. The snippet returns the stated constants and the angle (12960 / 25920) × 360° = 180°.\n\n### Ślokas & anvaya\n> **अष्टोत्तरशतैरंशैः शून्यबिन्दुः प्रदृश्यते ।  \n> कामाख्या-केदार-कन्या-त्रिकोणे मण्डलं विभु ॥**\n>\n> *aṣṭottaraśatairaṃśaiḥ śūnyabinduḥ pradṛśyate |  \n> kāmākhyā-kedāra-kanyā-trikoṇe maṇḍalaṃ vibhu ||*\n>\n> **Meter:** अनुष्टुभ् छन्दः\n>\n> **Source:** स्रोत अपरीक्षित · source unverified — no text in this repository carries this verse; it is not presented as a located quotation. Annex verse: not presented as a classical text.\n\n- **अष्टोत्तरशतैः अंशैः**: Through 108 physical qubit degrees\n- **शून्यबिन्दुः प्रदृश्यते**: The central Śūnya Bindu is revealed\n- **त्रिकोणे मण्डलं विभु**: The sacred geodetic triangle holds cosmic holonomy\n\nAcross 108 degrees of quantum freedom, the Śūnya Bindu shines forth. The triangle of Kamakhya, Kedarnath, and Kanyakumari bounds universal holonomy.\n\n### Formulation — Geodetic Berry Phase Holonomy & Precessional Lock\n$$\\Omega_{\\text{Berry}} = 0.040479 \\text{ rad}, \\quad \\theta_k = \\frac{W_K}{25920} \\times 360^\\circ = 180.0^\\circ$$\n\nNo circuit, shot count or job record is in this repository; the numbers in this chapter are constants written in the snippet."
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 5,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": "def precessional_phase_lock(k=12960):\n    return {\"angle_deg\": (k / 25920.0) * 360.0, \"predictability\": \"71.4% (Single-State 1011)\"}\n\ndef geodetic_berry_phase():\n    return {\"rad\": 0.040479, \"deg\": 2.3193, \"gate\": \"RZ(0.040479)\"}"
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 6,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "output_type": "stream",
     "name": "stdout",
     "text": "precessional_phase_lock() → {'angle_deg': 180.0, 'predictability': '71.4% (Single-State 1011)'}\ngeodetic_berry_phase() → {'rad': 0.040479, 'deg': 2.3193, 'gate': 'RZ(0.040479)'}\n"
    }
   ],
   "source": "print('precessional_phase_lock()', \"→\", repr(precessional_phase_lock()))\nprint('geodetic_berry_phase()', \"→\", repr(geodetic_berry_phase()))"
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": "**Recorded output (dataset `codeOutput`, verified against the run above):**\n```\nprecessional_phase_lock() → {'angle_deg': 180.0, 'predictability': '71.4% (Single-State 1011)'}\ngeodetic_berry_phase() → {'rad': 0.040479, 'deg': 2.3193, 'gate': 'RZ(0.040479)'}\n(geodetic_berry_phase returns constants stated in the snippet; \"predictability\" is a hardcoded label, not a measurement; no quantum-hardware result is recorded in this repository)\nComputed by executing this snippet (Python 3.11.15, 2026-10-07).\n```"
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": "## Chapter 4: एक स्थिर तिथि तक दिन-गणना (2028-02-23) (A Fixed-Date Day Count (2028-02-23))\n**Scope:** `Snippet only — no verse` · **Reading:** `3 min study`\n\n### Overview\nThe snippet counts the days from a given Julian Day to 2028-02-23 (JD 2461825.5), a date written into it as a constant. Nothing here derives that date or gives it a meaning, and it is not a prediction. (Until 2026-10-07 this chapter carried a verse about a “dreadful” transition that occurs in no text in this repository, and called the date a release date; both are removed.)\n\n### Ślokas & anvaya\n(no verse)\n\n### Formulation — Days to a fixed Julian Day\n$$\\text{days} = \\lfloor \\text{JD}_{\\text{target}} - \\text{JD} \\rfloor, \\quad \\text{JD}_{\\text{target}} = 2461825.5 \\; (\\text{2028-02-23, 0h UT})$$\n\nPlain date arithmetic. No daśā, Yoginī or Saturn cycle is computed by this snippet."
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 7,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [],
   "source": "def days_to_fixed_date(jd_current, target_jd=2461825.5):\n    # 2461825.5 = 2028-02-23 0h UT, a date written into this snippet as a constant\n    return {\"target_date\": \"2028-02-23\", \"days_remaining\": max(0, int(target_jd - jd_current))}"
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "code",
   "execution_count": 8,
   "metadata": {},
   "outputs": [
    {
     "output_type": "stream",
     "name": "stdout",
     "text": "days_to_fixed_date(2461305.5) → {'target_date': '2028-02-23', 'days_remaining': 520}\n"
    }
   ],
   "source": "print('days_to_fixed_date(2461305.5)', \"→\", repr(days_to_fixed_date(2461305.5)))"
  },
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": "**Recorded output (dataset `codeOutput`, verified against the run above):**\n```\ndays_to_fixed_date(2461305.5) → {'target_date': '2028-02-23', 'days_remaining': 520}\n(target_date is a constant written in the snippet; only days_remaining is computed (input JD 2461305.5 = 2026-09-21 0h UT); the date is not derived here and is not a prediction)\nComputed by executing this snippet (Python 3.11.15, 2026-10-07).\n```"
  }
 ],
 "metadata": {
  "kernelspec": {
   "display_name": "Python 3 (ipykernel)",
   "language": "python",
   "name": "python3"
  },
  "language_info": {
   "name": "python",
   "version": "3.12"
  }
 },
 "nbformat": 4,
 "nbformat_minor": 5
}